
Massachusetts Lottery May Quickly Offer DFS. Massachusetts AG Maura Healey, who has drafted a framework for the regulation of DFS into the Bay State.
The Massachusetts Lottery Commission is proposing modernization that is sweeping and it has formally stated its intent to consider online ticket club player casino no deposit sales, as well as offering its very own daily dream sports and social video gaming items.
Massachusetts is making noises about adopting a comprehensive online gaming package for a while, as it seeks to complement its emergent land-based casino industry and successful lottery product with an even more up-to-date and competitive offering that is online.
While Web casino video gaming and poker would require a huge upheaval that is legislative DFS and social video gaming would not ( at the least within the Bay State), also it’s clear that Massachusetts is intent on creating its own fantasy activities product as a means attracting younger generation that eschews traditional draws, scratch cards and keno in favor of more recent, mobile-friendly trends.
Formal Invite
As a result, the state has launched a formal request information (RFI), inviting companies to submit ‘proposals for the development, implementation, functional support, and maintenance of the Massachusetts Lottery iLottery System,’ read a statement that is official.
This would include ‘the development and integration of digital versions of existing and lottery that is new, including but not limited to social video gaming and day-to-day fantasy recreations options.’
Of particular interest to the Lottery Commission are player authentication and registration protocols, also as guidelines for responsible video gaming controls.
The commission also states that it is searching for ways of integrating lottery ticket retailers so that you can protect the 7,500-odd businesses that are small depend on lottery sales commissions.
Homegrown Product
‘We think the introduction of a dream sports platform at Massachusetts Lottery would help to embrace a market that is emerging continuing to protect our retail partners,’ Lottery Executive Director Michael Sweeney told the News provider recently.
‘ This particular kind of game would maybe not cannibalize our existing products. It would obviously be a new product. It could help us to interact what we would refer to as a ‘next-generation’ player and hopefully it would also assist Lottery to produce a new revenue source compared to eroding or keeping existing offers.’
Throughout the border in ny State, Attorney General Eric Schneiderman is railing contrary to the ‘fraudulent’ nature for the DFS industry, but Massachusetts’ AG Maura Healey has declared that there are no federal or state legislation that preclude such sites from operating.
Healy has proposed complete regulation of DFS, drawing up protocols to protect consumers, and has said that state residents who play DFS should ‘not be concerned’ that they are breaking the law.
All things considered, there’s nothing incorrect with adopting just a little local innovation, and DraftKings, created and bred in Boston, is maybe benefitting from being fully a homegrown success story.
India Supreme Court Panel Recommends Legalizing Sports Betting
Previous India Supreme Court Justice Rajendra Mal Lodha is recommending that the country legalize cricket betting and gambling in order to crackdown on corruption. (Image: The Hindu)
Asia is one step closer to legalizing activities betting and gambling after a panel appointed by the nation’s Supreme Court recommended modifying the longstanding gaming ban in order to combat a growing epidemic of illegal wagering.
Home to over 1.2 billion people, India is the second-most populated country in the world.
Now three lawmakers, former Chief Justice Rajendra Mal Lodha, along with retired Justices Ashok Bhan and RV Raveendran, opined to the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) that legalized sports wagering would offer more transparency and cut down on rogue backdoor wagering.
‘It [betting] would serve both the game and economy if legalized,’ Lodha told reporters on Monday, adding that the market must certanly be opened, but only with extensive safeguards in position to ensure that players and those with direct ties to sports matches are banned from participating.
2013 Scandal
Last January, India’s Supreme Court formed the panel, with Lodha serving as chairman, in response to the 2013 Indian Premier League match-fixing scandal that rocked the sport and dominated headlines.
The events of 2013 were unprecedented though the sport of cricket is no stranger to controversy.
The investigation that is lengthy Delhi Police led to charges against 39 people and two-year suspensions for the Rajasthan Royals and Chennai Super Kings cricket teams.
The extensive match-fixing and illegal betting led the BCCI to make a plan to enhance its infrastructure and look for how to mend its moral standing.
The acts that are criminal resulted in intervention by the Supreme Court and Lodha’s panel concluding that BCCI and India should embrace a controlled gambling market to remove illegal betting systems and properly monitor players and officials.
BCCI Unlikely to Embrace New Vision
Cricket is probably the most popular activity in India, even though the sport’s governing body claims it wants to completely clean its league up, the federal government might not be so wanting to closing gambling prohibition.
With the exception of horse racing, gambling in Asia has been illegal for almost 150 years.
In addition to proposing cricket that is legal, Lodha’s outline additionally recommends transforming the BCCI’s power framework and organization from top to bottom. The BCCI has remained mum on the Lodha report so far.
The choice to authorize gaming and sports betting doesn’t reside with the BCCI; that task goes to officials on the state and levels that are federal.
‘ The federal government will probably leave it alone as it remains a contentious issue,’ India Bet Managing Director George Oborne told eGaming Review.
Gambling has mostly been a states’ liberties topic over the full years, but of the nation’s 29 states and seven territories, just three have taken actions to expand the industry: Goa, Daman, and Sikkim.
Though gambling can offer revenues that are substantial monies for local governments, numerous in India believe any expansion of gambling additionally leads to an expansion in crime, corruption, and money laundering.
Lodha argues gambling’s already there, albeit illegally, and that swift action must be taken.
‘With big cash and attention, there is not the caution that is necessary protect the game as well as its players from the orgy of excess,’ he stated.
Second PokerStars Boycott Struggles to Make Impact After Very First Effort Fizzled
Ike Haxton, who resigned on New Year’s as a PokerStars Pro in protest at the changes to the VIP system day. (Image: pokerstars.com)
A 2nd PokerStars boycott by high-stakes and high-variance players is apparently neglecting to create a dent that is discernible at minimum on the site’s traffic numbers.
Around 1,600 players subscribed to the protest, according to organizers.
Per industry number-cruncher PokerScout.com, while traffic dipped on January 1st, initial day’s the hit, it actually rose on January 2nd, in comparison with the same day the previous week, while Sunday, January 3rd remained on par with figures from the same time the prior week.
Of course, it’s impossible to know simply how much the sudden dearth of high stakes players affects PokerStars’ daily rake, and whether all the players who pledged to sit out have in truth proved real to their word.
The boycott, which is due to get rid of Thursday, January 7th, has been organized by several groups including WeArePokerPlayers.com and Tiltbook.com, as well as a wide range of high-profile, high stakes players on the 2+2 forums, in protest towards an overhaul that is major the VIP system, which took impact on January 1st.
PokerStars announced in November that these changes would include scrapping Supernova Elite rewards for 2016, despite the achievement of the status being a process that is two-year.
Boycott Backfired?
PokerStars claims that the changes are designed to improve the poker ecology, but they leave high-stakes, high-volume players high and dry.
While these players represent a number of the website’s most avid, long-term, and high-ranking players, they are generally net-withdrawing players rather than the hordes of net-depositors that the online poker giant is anxious to attract.
The first boycott took place between December 1st and 3rd, with 2,600 players joining in the sit out. But that event clashed with the PokerStars Christmas Festival, so traffic numbers remained similar, except that those high-stakes players were replaced with lower stakes players attracted by low buy-ins and jackpot rewards.
While PokerStars is probable to have raked less during that period, it declared itself vindicated by the December boycott.
‘During the three-day boycott we recorded the healthiest consecutive three-day ecosystem results of the entire year with steady net gaming revenue, despite the fact that our net-depositing players lost at a much lower rate than they will have all year,’ wrote Eric Hollreiser, VP of Communications for PokerStars and Amaya.
More Boycotts Planned
The players that are affected undeterred, but, and are determined showing PokerStars that they can make the operator’s life hard.
And more boycotts are planned in the future. WeArePokerPlayers.com has launched a campaign searching for 5,000 signatures to accept at least a strike that is month-long while other protestors have actually suggested that a 10,000-player boycott could reduce PokerStars’ rake by up to 30 percent.
On New Year’s time, Ike Haxton became the second high-profile PokerStars Pro to resign in disgust at the modifications, following exemplory instance of Alex Millar, whom severed ties utilizing the site right before the vacation period.
‘As a four time Supernova Elite, I know what it takes to rake 1M VPP in a ‘ wrote haxton on 2+2 year. ‘It’s a grind that is tough. For some of the players that do it, it is an all-consuming dedication more intense than most full time jobs.
‘Many of them have relocated far from their homes and families to pursue it,’ he added. ‘Finding out, just while you expected them to be is brutal as you approach the finish line, that your efforts will not be rewarded. I cannot in good conscience carry on to endorse a poker web site that treats its players this real way.’