A teacher therefore acts as a buffer or interpreter, deciding exactly what their pupils are ready to know

A teacher therefore acts as a buffer or interpreter, deciding exactly what their pupils are ready to know. A teacher may also decide to be extremely strategic, hiding some expectations from their pupils and showing them short-cuts in order to get top marks possible. This could be particularly obvious under time pressure or near exams. For instance, a teacher might personally value focus on detail and emphasise the need to learn the correct spelling of key terminology. However, many exam papers don’t allocate marks to spelling provided that the examiner is able to know very well what word ended up being intended. You will find even instances, for instance in GCSE English, where among the papers has marks for spelling while the other doesn’t. a strategic teacher could therefore maximise marks due to their pupils by revealing this aspect of the hidden curriculum while get yourself ready for particular papers, however it would be counter-productive to that particular teacher’s personal expectations to reveal the reduced value given to spelling too soon within the school year.

Finally, how you feel about the positives or negatives of a hidden curriculum will mostly rely on your political views. The thought of a hidden curriculum has its roots in Marxist philosophies, when a hidden curriculum is nearly totally negative because it is an underhand way to force children into understanding how to be compliant and passive employees as time goes by. If you accept this view, then you might wish to expose a few of the hidden curriculum to your pupils to help them avoid becoming wage slaves – teaching them how exactly to ‘play the game’ in assessments might therefore be viewed being a liberating act. Conversely, you may believe since society will pay for education it has a moral straight to set the agenda for the way the next generation will act in terms of citizenship and their place in society.

exactly What techniques can we use to minimise negative hidden curriculums in teaching practice?

among the defining options that come with a hidden curriculum is in addition to that there is some type of a secret agenda, but that lots of associated with intentions, values or expectations in a hidden curriculum cannot be made explicit – there is something intangible about them that cannot be put in words. Clearly, this may not always be the instance, and one simple strategy is for teachers to critically evaluate and think about their practice so that they can become more honest with pupils by making up to they could explicit. However, attempting to be explicit about many values or expectations could risk over-simplifying or creating confusion.

Addressing the hidden curriculum outside of assessment can be more problematic since the hidden curriculum could permeate many facets of what we do with this pupils. Furthermore, many facets of the hidden curriculum are helpful for the smooth running of schools. The Marxist critique of hidden curriculums creating compliant ‘wage slaves’ is actually unwanted, but a completely laissez-faire approach would be chaos within our classrooms. We might even question just how appropriate it’s for a teacher to expose facets of the hidden curriculum as it may be interpreted as subversive behaviour. Probably the most useful defence against the negative facets of a hidden curriculum is really a strong foundation of critical thinking and self-reflection skills, enabling pupils to think for themselves how they are increasingly being persuaded to behave in a few means. Equally, you may believe your home being a teacher isn’t to encourage pupils to question authority but instead to strengthen the values that you decided to whenever you qualified.extended essay ib examples biology research based

Conclusion

The wide-reaching role schools play in society means that almost anything teachers and pupils do is imbued with hidden meanings and intentions. The idea of a hidden curriculum helps us to see what ideas we are putting across to the learners, and think about whether these are appropriate. Schools prepare children to enter the workforce and society as a whole, so a school is normally regarded as a safe area to take into account the expectations and explore the boundaries.

The thought of a hidden curriculum also exposes a few of the flaws within our assessment system and how challenging it may be to help pupils know very well what is expected of these. Reflecting in the hidden curriculum should enable you to consider whether you’re helping pupils to build up new skills and abilities or whether you’re helping them to pass an assessment of these skills and abilities. The truth is probably somewhere in the centre, and this too is really a variety of hidden curriculum once we try to better understand how each individual pupil experiences the college curriculum in its broadest sense.

Bibliography

Becker, H., Geer, B., and Hughes, E. (1968). Making the Grade. London: Transaction.

Jackson, P. (1968). Life in Classrooms. Nyc: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Marton, F. & Säljö, R. (1976). On Qualitative Differences on Learning: I – Outcome and Process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.

Richardson, M., Abraham, C., and Bond, R. (2012). Psychological correlates of university students’ educational performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis, Psychological Bulletin 138(2), 353-387.

Sambell, K. and McDowell, L. (1998). The construction associated with hidden curriculum: messages and meanings within the assessment of student learning, Assessment and Evaluation in advanced schooling, 23(4), 391-402.

Snyder, B. (1971). The Hidden Curriculum. Nyc: Alfred A. Knopf.

To export a mention of this article please select a referencing style below:

Other Courses

We’ve received widespread press coverage since 2003

Your UKEssays purchase is protected and now we’re rated 4.4/5 on reviews.co.uk

All work is written to order. No plagiarism, guaranteed!

We’re here to answer any questions you’ve got about our services

Copyright © 2003 – 2020 – UKEssays is really a trading name of All Answers Ltd, company registered in England and Wales. Company Registration No: 4964706. VAT Registration No: 842417633. Registered Data Controller No: Z1821391. Registered office: Venture House, Cross Street, Arnold, Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 7PJ.

*You may also browse our support articles here >

“

Welcome to chapter 2 associated with ‘Inclusion’ module. This chapter will begin with the beginning of this idea, talking about exactly what Inclusion really is. Creating a strong knowledge of why inclusion is essential, and exactly what constitutes inclusion, may be the first faltering step to building it into your teaching practice.

Goals with this area

Objectives with this area

Begin the Lecture

Other Courses

We’ve received widespread press coverage since 2003

Your UKEssays purchase is protected and now we’re rated 4.4/5 on reviews.co.uk

All work is written to order. No plagiarism, guaranteed!

We’re here to answer any questions you’ve got about our services

*You may also browse our support articles here >

“

Learning Objectives with this chapter

By the end of the chapter, we wish you:

what’s Pragmatism?

By nature, pragmatists are pluralists – they believe that that we now have many different realities, with everyone looking for truth and finding meaning in life based on their experiences. They spot a great deal of emphasis upon change, emphasizing the truth that the planet is really a work in progress, a reality that will be in a continuing state of flux. They believe in utilitarian principles – the greatest good for the best number, while the fulfilment and meeting of individual need.Pragmatists have confidence in experimentation, placing more importance in the notion of being active in learning, giving more credence to actions than ideas (Educational System, 2013). Pragmatists judge something to be good if it has achieved exactly what it attempted to do; basically, pragmatism is definitely an approach towards successfully “”… getting things done”” (Talisse and Aikin, 2008, p. 1).

Pragmatism developed being a way of thinking within the 19th century with the job of CS Peirce, William James and John Dewey, that are often referred to as the ‘classical’ pragmatists. Despite having different views on a number of different problems, they’ve common themes which are empiricist within the broadest sense, although they reject much of the mental image that will be associated with empiricism (Godfrey-Smith, 2015). They focused upon the links between a individual experience and their thoughts with regards to actions. To any or all intents and purposes, pragmatists don’t have confidence in the notion that we now have a couple of foundational values which underpin all others. They choose to assess opinions and ways of inquiry in light of the usefulness in achieving set goals and/or their consequences.

How does it affect Education?

so far as the pragmatist can be involved, activity may be the cornerstone associated with educative process. They adopt an attitude similar to Constructivist thinkers such as for instance Piaget and Vygotsky who believe that children acquire their own knowledge via a process of experimentation in, and conversation with their environment (Moore, 2000). Pragmatists regard every activity and conversation included in the educative process, which by requisite involves a continuing restructuring of these experiences to be able to apply them to different circumstances, therefore forming new habits (Kivenen and Ristela, 2003). Pragmatists maintain that as society changes and folks mature, their views and their experiences can change their existing knowledge and for that reason their possible actions as time goes by. It is therefore crucial to them that problem-solving reaches the core of most education, making the educative process empirical and experimental in nature (Educational System, 2013).

so far as education can be involved, there are many implications which result from a pragmatic stance. Pragmatists believe that education is an ever-evolving process of reviewing, reconstructing and integrating their experiences as individuals move through life. With that said, pragmatists hold the view that it’s crucial to maintain the culture associated with past within societies whilst tackling the situations which occur in the present and to merge the two. Experimentation and real-life experiences hold the key to real knowledge, in that these activities produce growth and change in individuals plus the societies in which they live. The kid and their needs is at the centre associated with educative process as they need to have the freedom to learn their particular inherent abilities and their possible, that can easily be supported and developed through their schooling.

The parallels utilizing the views of Vygotsky may also be observed in the pragmatists’ views of education being a social process. Being a result of being sociable, folks are able to gain more knowledge through interacting with whomever is in their environment, or the surroundings itself, in order to make progress. It is believed that the social process will induce the development of attitudes and feelings which are acceptable to society in particular which will enable individuals to just take their spot and ‘fit in’ happily as time goes by. However, this may be a process which continues throughout life because of individuals continually reflecting upon their experiences and adjusting their attitudes and actions, as well as developing their personality. So far as this way of thinking can be involved, there shouldn’t be any particular preconceived aims and objectives within education – the direction and aims of any educative provision should maintain line utilizing the child’s experience. Pragmatists believe that knowledge is one collective device, leaving all of them with the desire to develop a curriculum that will be dynamic and flexible to your degree that children are able to develop problem-solving skills and adjust to the constantly changing world around them (Educational System, 2013; Sankaranarayanan and Sindhu, 2012).

Pragmatists hold the view that education is ‘learning by doing’. It should therefore be grounded in children’s experiences as well as different activities and preparation due to their future life. It is their view that along with school subjects, time is afforded to children to engage in free, meaningful social conversation within the curriculum (Shawal, 2016). The kid reaches the centre associated with educative process – their needs, their interests and aspirations. This means that the approaches adopted for teaching should really be both flexible and dynamic to your degree that they’ll be modified to look after the subject material, plus the needs and abilities associated with children. This kind of approach towards education sees practitioners adopting the role of a friend and guide, who is conscious of the interests of individual children, as well as having an awareness associated with changing nature of society (Witzky, n.d.; Shawal, 2016). Teachers provide issues due to their pupils which are made to stimulate and attention them, utilizing the expectation they find answers to them, either as individuals or in groups (Educational System, 2013; Whitzky, n.d.). The event of most educators would be to become a facilitator when it comes to those activities and materials, so that the kids are able to have a meaningful educational experience. Teachers also act as a resource in their own right and help to guide students within the right direction.

talents and restrictions

A number of criticisms happen levelled at the notion of pragmatism. For instance, the truth that this philosophy doesn’t espouse any absolute criteria is seen as a limitation. Based on pragmatists, truth changes based on circumstances, times and places and that truths are made being a result of our experiences. These opinions can lead to corruption and vice within society, as over-arching values and criteria of moral behaviour create cohesion within society, sufficient reason for them the capability to evaluate conduct within society. It is noticeable that pragmatists do not have any form of spiritual values, utilizing the philosophy advocating a far more extreme types of utilitarianism (Shawal, 2016). an absence of spiritual values and some form of moral code can make conflict and disharmony; whilst it is true that individual values change as societies change, it is necessary for the upkeep of law and order that there is a group of common values to reside by. This rejection of spiritual values and a moral code is reflected in a pragmatists belief that folks should only concentrate upon the current while the future as opposed to dwelling upon the past (Educational System, 2013).

when it comes to education, the fact that pragmatists set no predetermined aims for education might be seen as a serious flaw. If there are no aims and objectives attached to the educative process, just how is accomplishment to be examined and/or evaluated? Just how can planning of activities to fully capture the interest of children be accomplished? It’s also very hard to create a curriculum where all knowledge are gained from life experiences. Devising and choosing project work to quickly attain a holistic curriculum is very difficult (Educational System, 2013) – as well as the problem of planning, practitioners by themselves might not be able to handle the demands of the approach towards teaching and learning because of needing to act in a supervisory capability in the place of an immediate purveyor of information (Neeraja, 2003).

The talents of pragmatism lie in its view that the kid is at the centre associated with educative process. They focus upon the notion that children develop as individuals as a result of unique efforts, based on their experiences and their conversation utilizing the environment and the ones around them. Children are actively encouraged to interact making use of their learning through problem-solving and addressing projects which enables them to explore and find out things utilizing their imagination and creativity. a pragmatic education is a practical education, in that it prepares children really efficiently for future years life. It’s also an education that stresses democratic values and collective duty which they believe enables individuals to build up skills, attributes and characteristics that will easily fit in well with society in particular (Educational System, 2013).

Links to rehearse

Dewey’s focus on educating the whole kid led him to be regarded as “”… the father of Progressive education”” (State University.com, n.d., para 2). Progressivists hold the view that education’s sole focus is in the whole child as opposed to your teacher or this content associated with curriculum. This kind of philosophy stresses the need for students to try ideas through active experimentation and that learning is founded upon the questions that learners run into through experiencing the world. It is an active versus a passive process (Cohen, 1999). It is critical to note that Dewey’s writings and philosophy of education move one step away from dogmatic Pragmatism, in that he joined the ideas of thinking and doing [the cognitive together with kinaesthetic] (State University.com, n.d.) as part of the process of learning and making progress, in the place of the notion that knowledge might be repeated to your degree that its application became habitual. The amalgam of these differing views assisted Progressives to build up a philosophy of education which enables children to comprehend the connection between thought and action which allows them the opportunity to take part in a democratic society when they reach maturity (State University.com, n.d.).

The influence of experiential learning is visible through the educative system in the Western world, especially in the uk. The notions of experiential learning and its importance to children’s development is visible within the Early Years Foundation Stage [EYFS] (Department of Education [DfE], 2014) framework which places children in the centre regarding the learning process. The emphasis is on experiential learning through play, the origins of that can easily be traced back to Isaacs (1932), Montessori (1966) while the Developmentally Appropriate Practice Approach (Bredekamp and Copple, 1997). The EYFS acknowledges the need for every child to be in receipt of individual treatment through the creation of an environment which supplies due to their personal needs whilst helping them to build up socially through positive relationships. This encourages them to discover their capabilities and facilitates the development into self-confident individuals who are able to interact with others inside their learning. The National Curriculum (DfE, 2014a) also places a lot of emphasis upon children gaining experience through doing authentic problem-solving activities. To be able to offer children’s holistic development, primary schools frequently engage in project work which draws together different subject areas, whilst placing a focus on both literacy and numeracy. It is within Key Stages 1 and 2 that there is most evidence of experiential learning, although secondary school education provides opportunities for children to interact with active learning through experimentation in science classes as well as in problem-solving across many different different subjects.

Conclusion

Dewey’s impact on education should not be underestimated. His tips about experiential education have ensured that generations of learners happen supplied with skills for life as well as an enthusiasm for learning which runs throughout their life. It may be argued that his vision has opened a vast variety of different learning opportunities from children within the class, to adults at work, all of which are based on life experiences.

Select bibliography

Bredekamp, S., Copple, C. (1997) Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Tools. (Revised Edition) Washington: National Association for the Education of young kids

Bruce, T. (2004) Developing Learning in Early Childhood. London: Sage

Bruce, T. (1996) Helping Young Children to Play. London: Hodder & Stoughton

Cohen, L. M. (1999) ‘Section III – Philosophical Perspectives in Education.’ Retrieved 12th January 2017 from http://oregonstate.edu/instruction/ed416/PP3.html

Department for Education (2014) Statutory Framework for the Early Years Foundation Stage: Setting the standards for learning, development and care for children from birth to five. London: Department for Education

Department for Education (2014a) The National Curriculum in England. Framework Document. London: Department for Educaation

Godfrey-Smith, P. (2015) ‘Pragmatism: Philosophical Aspects.’ Wright, J. (Ed) (2nd Ed) Global Encyclopedia associated with social and behavioural sciences Vol. 18 Oxford: Elsevier pp. 803 – 807

Groves, L., McNish, H. (2008) Baseline Study of Play as Merrylee Primary School, Glasgow. Forestry Commission Scotland

Hughes, B. (2006) Playtypes: Speculations and Possibilities. London: London Centre for Playwork Education and Training

Isaacs, S. (1932) The Nursery Years your brain regarding the Child from Birth to Six Years. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul

Kivenen, O., Ristela, P. (2003) ‘From Constructivism to a Pragmatist Conception of Learning.’ Oxford Review of Education Vol. 29, # 3, pp. 363 – 375

Kolb, D. A. (1984) Experiential Learning: Experience being a supply of Learning and Development. Englewood Cliffs, Nj-new Jersey: Prentice-Hall

Montessori, M. (1966) The Key of Childhood. Nyc: Ballantine Books

Moore, A. (2000) Teaching and Learning: Pedagogy, Curriculum and heritage. London: Routledge

Neeraja, K. P. (2003) Textbook of Nursing Education. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Health Publishers Ltd

Nilson, L. B. (2010) Teaching At Its Most Useful: A Research-Based Resource for College Instructors. (3rd Ed) Bay Area, CA: Jossey-Bass

Northern Illinois University (n.d.) ‘Experiential learning.’ Retrieved 11th January 2017 from http://www.niu.edu/facdev/_pdf/guide/strategies/experiential_learning.pdf

O’Brien, L., Murray, R. (2005) ‘Forest schools in England and Wales: Woodland area to master and grow.’ Environmental Education Autumn, pp. 25 – 27

Rae, L. (1997) Planning and Designing Training Programmes. Aldershot: Gower Publishing Ltd

Riley, K. (2007) ‘Re-connecting with all the natural environment – forest schools in Sussex.’ Environmental Education Spring, p. 7

Sankaranarayanan, B., Sindhu, B. (2012) Learning and Teaching Nursing. (4th Ed) New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Health Publishers Ltd

Sayeed, Z., Guerin, E. (2000) Early Years Play: A Delighted Medium for Assessment and Intervention. London: David Fulton

Shawal, M. (2017) ‘Pragmatism in Education: Study Notes.’ Retrieved 12th January 2017 from http://www.yourarticlelibrary.com/education/pragmatism-in-education-study-notes/69152/

State University.com (n.d.) ‘Progressive Education – Philosophical Foundations, Pedagogical Progressivism, Administrative Progressivism, Life-Adjustment Progressivism.’ Retrieved 12th January 2017 from http://education.stateuniversity.com/pages/2336/Progressive-Education.html

Talisse, R. B., Aikin, S. F. (2008) Pragmatism: A Guide for the Perplexed. London: Continuum Global Publishing Group

Vocabulary.com (n.d.) ‘Pragmatic.’ Retrieved 11th January https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/pragmatic

Witzky, A. (n.d.) ‘Pragmatism in Education.’ PowerPoint presentation – edu-513. Retrieved 12th January from https://edu.513.wikispaces.com/file/view/Pragmatism+in+Education.ppt

To export a mention of this article please select a referencing style below:

Other Courses

We’ve received widespread press coverage since 2003

Your UKEssays purchase is protected and now we’re rated 4.4/5 on reviews.co.uk

All work is written to order. No plagiarism, guaranteed!

We’re here to answer any questions you’ve got about our services

*You may also browse our support articles here >

“

Learning objectives with this chapter:

By the end of the chapter, you need to able to:

exactly what is a national curriculum?

according to a 2009 UK parliamentary committee report, a national curriculum “”sets out the human body of knowledge, skills and knowing that a society wants to pass on to its children and young adults”” (House of Commons, 2009). National curricula provide a broad group of subjects and cover all the many years of compulsory education in the country concerned. The national curriculum will also indicate the minimum level of attainment to be targeted while the criteria children are required to achieve within the subjects studied. National curricula will even state the staging points at which children are tested, so when formal examinations will happen for qualification purposes.

The National Curriculum in England

The college curriculum has elements which are considered part of the National Curriculum, along with other elements which lay outside of this mandated provision, but which are however compulsory. Schools in England, for instance, are required to offer religious education throughout compulsory schooling years, and sex and relationships education from year 7 (age 11, or the beginning of secondary school) onwards. Though schools must definitely provide religious education, parents/carers can elect to have their child opt out of such lessons on faith grounds; children can also be excused from some facets of sex and relationship education in the same grounds (UK Government, 2015).

In England, the National Curriculum is arranged when it comes to clusters of educational years, into elements which are called key stages:

Ages 3-5: Preschool and reception: early years curriculum

Ages 5-7: Years 1 and 2 primary school: Key Stage 1 (with national evaluation and teacher assessments in English, maths and science in Year 2)

Ages 7-10: Years 3-6 primary school: Key Stage 2 (with national evaluation and teacher assessments in English, maths and science in Year 6)

Ages 11-14: Years 7-9 secondary school: Key Stage 3

Ages 15-16: Years 10-11 secondary school: Key Stage 4 (some children will take some GCSEs in Year 10, though all will take the bulk/all GCSEs or other national qualifications in Year 11).

16, or Year 11, may be the national school-leaving age in the united kingdom. However, the overwhelming majority of young adults continue into some type of further education, following either a vocational route leading to level 3 vocational qualifications, or an educational route going for A levels being a possible precursor advanced schooling (UK Government, 2016).

With respect to curricular arrangements in the UK, you will find attempts to offer two broad sets of aims which were developed from the 1996 Education Act, which necessary that all schools which were operating within the state sector were to offer an education that was both balanced and broad, and also satisfy two other sets of aims. In the first instance, the curriculum will have to promote development of children and young adults with respect to their spiritual, cultural, moral, mental, and physical development, and also to that of wider society, as well as in the 2nd instance, in order to make adequate preparation due to their emergence into adult life (Department for Education, 2007).

just How are national curricula developed?

National curricula tend to evolve over time. A component of prescription within the subjects to be covered in compulsory education dates to your 1870 Elementary Education Act, which established the principle of mandatory elementary education for all children; just before 1870, education ended up being only open to people who could pay for it (Gillard, 2011). Though a fully-available basic education took nearly 2 decades to be universally-available, it was even so the starting place for the National Curriculum, in that state oversight of education for many ended up being initiated.

By the mid-1980s, a consensus in government ended up being emerging for the establishment of a national curriculum. It was driven with a series of concerns: low criteria being evident in secondary education wide ranges in quality between different schools, perceptions of weaknesses in curriculum design as well as in the implementation of such planning documents, and overly-subjective assessment of pupil ability (Faulkner, 2009). The 1988 Education Reform Act ended up being the automobile by which the first iteration associated with National Curriculum ended up being established. The Act had three main aims, while the National Curriculum ended up being the main means by which these aims would be addressed. The aims were:

The 1988 Act not only introduced the National Curriculum, but at the same time required that responsibility for making certain the National Curriculum ended up being delivered faithfully ended up being placed with neighborhood authorities, with school governors, sufficient reason for school heads (in the place of with central government).

One hand, the inauguration of centralised curricular arrangement might be viewed to become a unifying force, driven by the perception that criteria needed at the same time raising, equalizing, and standardising. On the other hand, contemporary drivers towards schools becoming independent from neighborhood authority control, first in administrative contexts, then inside their curricular arrangements, have told a possibly different story. To some extent, it may be argued, the National Curriculum acts as a restrictive force on those schools electing to stay under neighborhood authority control, with those institutions operating in more of a free market context being allowed to have greater flexibility over their curricular arrangements.

just How closely do individual institutions have to stay glued to the national curriculum?

The National Curriculum doesn’t affect all schools equally. Education has turned into a devolved matter for national assemblies and similar types of regional government in Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland because the inception of national curriculum arrangements within the late 1980s in the united kingdom.